shudhanandam / marudhan

I hope that in a society of people where there is space for conflicting thoughts and differences of opinion, there is also space for agreements or convergence of opinion.

My very first reponse was congratulating Com.Marudhan for his articulative presentation (albeit strongly communist flavoured)

My further write ups took my points of differences one by one detailing why I differ from views of com.marudhan.

What has been rebutted strongly / lightly / harshly —- be feel free to add adjective of your own —- were certain ideas.

To give a flavour to that as if I have anger —- sorry, I do not agree with that. But,yes I have differences and I hope I have properly articulated that.

But giving a colour of red to that —– if that gives *anandam* to shudhanandam or other comrades —- be it so

But even to rebut someone, concentrate on points of differences and do not say things which I did not per se say.

good day.

Whether or not comrades likes it, there is continuous, strong and cordial exchange of philosophical thoughts between SAkta and baudha tantravadins (specifically vajrayana).

Ofcourse, if you say that only “X” stream of budhism is original and all else are fake in talibani style, there is nothing more to add.

Since currently I do not have a transliterator, my apologies for typing out in English.

My rebuttal is not about portraying budha as *poraLi* or portraying him as an icon who was successful in establishing a casteless society.

My rebuttals are on some other grounds.

1. That bhudha did no penance (thavam) at Gaya

2. That there is no connection whatsoever between the current day lamas and budha

3.That there is no connection between budhism and rituals, yoga, Zen et al et al.

4. That budhism have no place for manthra ucharanam.

Do not put words into my mouth. If you want to say something specific on these things, you may say so.

What was vehemently opposed by me was simply writing off different schools of budhism by respected comrade. And that is pure unadulterated talibanism which says only sunny Islam is true and all else are fake.

Tathagatha Babasaheb Ambedkar and Tathagatha Gauthama Budha need not necessarily in the pockets of comrades. They are hailed by a good lot of people who care for the welfare of the society.

Budha would remain Budha and different schools of budhism which flourished in the world and are sustained for centuries would continue to be sustained and flourish irrespective of overzealous communists trying to paint him red.

RGBதான் Primary Color என்று படித்துள்ளேன், இங்கேயும் அவ்வாறே உள்ளது : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_color

‘உ’ என்பது? முன்மை சுட்டு. சரிதானே..?

சரிதானா ??

அடிப்படை வண்ணங்கள்: சிவப்பு,
மஞ்சள், நீலம் (பச்சை அடிப்படை வண்ணம் கிடையாது – நீலம் + மஞ்சள் = பச்சை)

அடிப்படை வண்ணங்கள்: சிவப்பு, மஞ்சள், நீலம் (பச்சை அடிப்படை வண்ணம் கிடையாது – நீலம் + மஞ்சள் = பச்சை)